Meta-research studies should improve and evaluate their own data sharing practices - Université d'Angers Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Journal of Clinical Epidemiology Année : 2022

Meta-research studies should improve and evaluate their own data sharing practices

Résumé

Data sharing is gradually becoming a requirement across all fields of science, owing to its key benefits in verifying the reproducibility of findings and reusing existent data for new purposes. Although meta-research studies are complex, time-consuming and hinge on the availability of data produced and curated by others, there has been little focus on how they make their own data available. This is in stark contrast with the heightened attention data sharing has received in clinical research. Yet, as secondary data users par excellence, meta-researchers are ethically bound to both improving and evaluating data sharing practices, as well as correctly sharing their own data. We contrast particularities of data sharing in meta-research and clinical research, such as benefits, barriers, inadequate and potentially pervasive sharing practices. We conclude with an array of concrete and tailored recommendations for improvement.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Cristea et al. - 2022 - Meta-research studies should improve and evaluate .pdf (577.04 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Dates et versions

hal-03690340 , version 1 (16-06-2022)

Identifiants

Citer

Ioana Cristea, Florian Naudet, Laura Caquelin. Meta-research studies should improve and evaluate their own data sharing practices. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2022, 149, pp.183-189. ⟨10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.05.007⟩. ⟨hal-03690340⟩
52 Consultations
77 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More